Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.698
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 80(9): 924-932, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37436733

RESUMEN

Importance: Understanding how children's utilization of acute mental health care changed during the COVID-19 pandemic is critical for directing resources. Objective: To examine youth acute mental health care use (emergency department [ED], boarding, and subsequent inpatient care) during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis of national, deidentified commercial health insurance claims of youth mental health ED and hospital care took place between March 2019 and February 2022. Among 4.1 million commercial insurance enrollees aged 5 to 17 years, 17 614 and 16 815 youth had at least 1 mental health ED visit in the baseline year (March 2019-February 2020) and pandemic year 2 (March 2021-February 2022), respectively. Exposure: The COVID-19 pandemic. Main outcomes and measures: The relative change from baseline to pandemic year 2 was determined in (1) fraction of youth with 1 or more mental health ED visits; (2) percentage of mental health ED visits resulting in inpatient psychiatry admission; (3) mean length of inpatient psychiatric stay following ED visit; and (4) frequency of prolonged boarding (≥2 midnights) in the ED or a medical unit before admission to an inpatient psychiatric unit. Results: Of 4.1 million enrollees, 51% were males and 41% were aged 13 to 17 years (vs 5-12 years) with 88 665 mental health ED visits. Comparing baseline to pandemic year 2, there was a 6.7% increase in youth with any mental health ED visits (95% CI, 4.7%-8.8%). Among adolescent females, there was a larger increase (22.1%; 95% CI, 19.2%-24.9%). The fraction of ED visits that resulted in a psychiatric admission increased by 8.4% (95% CI, 5.5%-11.2%). Mean length of inpatient psychiatric stay increased 3.8% (95% CI, 1.8%-5.7%). The fraction of episodes with prolonged boarding increased 76.4% (95% CI, 71.0%-81.0%). Conclusions and relevance: Into the second year of the pandemic, mental health ED visits increased notably among adolescent females, and there was an increase in prolonged boarding of youth awaiting inpatient psychiatric care. Interventions are needed to increase inpatient child psychiatry capacity and reduce strain on the acute mental health care system.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Masculino , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Adolescente , Pandemias , Salud Mental , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias
2.
JAMA ; 329(17): 1469-1477, 2023 05 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37129655

RESUMEN

Importance: There has been increasing concern about the burden of mental health problems among youth, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic. Trends in mental health-related emergency department (ED) visits are an important indicator of unmet outpatient mental health needs. Objective: To estimate annual trends in mental health-related ED visits among US children, adolescents, and young adults between 2011 and 2020. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from 2011 to 2020 in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual cross-sectional national probability sample survey of EDs, was used to examine mental health-related visits for youths aged 6 to 24 years (unweighted = 49 515). Main Outcomes and Measures: Mental health-related ED visits included visits associated with psychiatric or substance use disorders and were identified by International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM; 2011-2015) and ICD-10-CM (2016-2020) discharge diagnosis codes or by reason-for-visit (RFV) codes. We estimated the annual proportion of mental health-related pediatric ED visits from 2011 to 2020. Subgroup analyses were performed by demographics and broad psychiatric diagnoses. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses estimated factors independently associated with mental health-related ED visits controlling for period effects. Results: From 2011 to 2020, the weighted number of pediatric mental health-related visits increased from 4.8 million (7.7% of all pediatric ED visits) to 7.5 million (13.1% of all ED visits) with an average annual percent change of 8.0% (95% CI, 6.1%-10.1%; P < .001). Significant linearly increasing trends were seen among children, adolescents, and young adults, with the greatest increase among adolescents and across sex and race and ethnicity. While all types of mental health-related visits significantly increased, suicide-related visits demonstrated the greatest increase from 0.9% to 4.2% of all pediatric ED visits (average annual percent change, 23.1% [95% CI, 19.0%-27.5%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Over the last 10 years, the proportion of pediatric ED visits for mental health reasons has approximately doubled, including a 5-fold increase in suicide-related visits. These findings underscore an urgent need to improve crisis and emergency mental health service capacity for young people, especially for children experiencing suicidal symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Trastornos Mentales , Salud Mental , Suicidio , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Adulto Joven , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/tendencias , Pandemias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/psicología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Emerg Med Australas ; 35(4): 553-559, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36603853

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Supported by the state government, three health networks partnered to initiate a virtual ED (VED), as part of a broader roll-out of emergency telehealth services in Victoria. The aim of the present study (Southeast Region Virtual Emergency Department-1 [SERVED-1]) was to report the initial 5-month experience and included all patients assessed through the service over the first 5 months (1 February 2022 to 30 June 2022). METHODS: VED consults occurred after referral from paramedics in the pre-hospital setting. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for demographic, presenting complaint and outcome data. The primary outcome was the count of VED consultations. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients where physical ED attendance was avoided within 72 h. The proportion of physical ED attendances avoided sub-grouped by primary presenting complaints were reported. RESULTS: There were 1748 patients who had a VED consultation, of which 1261 (72.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 70.0-74.2) patients had physical presentation to an ED avoided in the 72 h following the consult. There was a significant increase in consultations over the 5-month period (incidence rate ratio 1.27; 95% CI 1.23-1.31, P < 0.001) that was consistent in the three health services. The most common presenting complaints were COVID-19 and shortness of breath, and physical presentation was avoided most often among younger patients and those with COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Initial experience demonstrated a significant increase in adoption of the service and an overall avoidance of physical ED attendance by a majority of patients. These results support ongoing VED consultations, complemented by follow up and health economic evaluations.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Telemedicina , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Victoria
5.
BMC Med Educ ; 22(1): 571, 2022 Jul 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35870916

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore healthcare professionals, managers, and other key employees' experiences of oilcloth sessions as a strategy when implementing new emergency departments in Denmark, based on their participations in these sessions. The study addresses the importance of securing alignment in implementation strategies. Too often, this does not get enough attention in the literature and in practice. In this study, alignment among components was achieved in an educational implementation strategy called oilcloth sessions. METHODS: The study is based on participants' observations of 13 oilcloth sessions and follow-up via 53 semi-structured interviews with the board of directors, managers, and key employees from the present emergency department and different specialty departments. Data were analysed deductively using Biggs and Tang's model of didactic alignment. RESULTS: The analysis showed the complexity of challenges when using oilcloth sessions as a strategy when implementing a new emergency department described in terms of three phases and nine main themes (a-i): the preparation phase: (a) preparing individually and collectively, (b) objectives, (c) involving participants, (d) selecting cases; the execution phase: (e) using materials, (f) facilitating the sessions, (g) temporal structures; evaluation: (h) following up on the sessions, (i) adapting to the context. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that it is important to ensure alignment among elements in implementation strategies. Thus, oilcloth sessions with high alignment are useful if the challenges experienced are to be overcome and the strategy will be experienced as a useful way to support the implementation of a new emergency department from the participants' point of view. Bigg and Tang's didactic model is useful as an analytical framework to ensure alignment in implementation strategies in general.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Personal de Salud/normas , Dinamarca , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Personal de Salud/educación , Humanos , Investigación Cualitativa
6.
CMAJ Open ; 10(1): E100-E108, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35135825

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cannabis-related emergency department visits can be an entry point for youths to mental health and substance use care systems. We aimed to examine trends in cannabis-related emergency department visits as a function of youths' age and sex. METHODS: Using administrative data, we examined all visits to emergency departments in Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2017, by youth aged 10-24 years (grouped as 10-13, 14-18 and 19-24 yr) to determine trends in cannabis-related emergency department visits. Cannabis-related visits were identified using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision codes for cannabis poisoning and mental disorders due to cannabinoids. We categorized presentations as "less severe" versus "more severe" using scores assigned by nurses at triage. RESULTS: We examined 14 697 778 emergency department visits. Cannabis-related visits increased from 3.8 per 10 000 youths (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5-4.0) in 2003 to 17.9 (95% CI 17.4-18.4) in 2017, a 4.8-fold increase (95% CI 4.4-5.1). Rates increased for both sexes and each age group. Males were more likely to have a visit than females (rate ratios ≥ 1.5 in 2003 and 2017). The number of cannabis-related visits in 2017 was 25.0 per 10 000 (95% CI 24.0-25.9) among youth aged 19-24 years, 21.9 per 10 000 (95% CI 20.9-22.9) among those aged 14-18 years, and 0.8 per 10 000 (95% CI 0.5-1.0) among those aged 10-13 years. In 2017, 88.2% (95% CI 87.3%-89.0%) of cannabis-related visits and 58.1% (95% CI 58.0%-58.2%) of non-cannabis-related visits were triaged as "more severe," (rate ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.50-1.53). Similarly, in 2017, 19.0% (95% CI 18.0%-20.1%) of cannabis-related visits and 5.8% (95% CI 5.7%-5.8%) of non-cannabis-related visits resulted in hospital admission (rate ratio 3.3, 95% CI 3.1-3.5). INTERPRETATION: Rates of cannabis-related emergency department visit by youths aged 10-24 years increased almost fivefold from 2003 to 2017, with increases in visit severity and hospital admissions. These trends describe an emerging public health problem, and research is needed to identify the causes of this increase and the health and social consequences of cannabis-related visits for these youths.


Asunto(s)
Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Abuso de Marihuana , Trastornos Mentales , Intoxicación , Problemas Sociales , Adolescente , Canadá/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Abuso de Marihuana/complicaciones , Abuso de Marihuana/epidemiología , Abuso de Marihuana/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Intoxicación/epidemiología , Intoxicación/etiología , Intoxicación/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Problemas Sociales/prevención & control , Problemas Sociales/tendencias , Adulto Joven
7.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 24(1): 5-8, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35077037

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In response to the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, routine clinical visits to the ophthalmic emergency department (OED) were deferred, while emergency cases continued to be seen. OBJECTIVES: To assess the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for ophthalmic emergencies. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis of patients who presented to the OED during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic was conducted. The proportions of traumatic, non-traumatic-urgent, and non-traumatic-non-urgent presentations in 2020 were compared to those of the same time period in 2019. Duration of chief complains and best-corrected visual acuity were also assessed. RESULTS: There were 144 OED visits in 2020 compared to 327 OED visits during the same 3-week-period in 2019. Lower mean age of OED patients was present in 2020. Logarithmic expression (LogMAR) best corrected visual acuity (BVCA) was similar in both years. In 2020 there was a reduction in traumatic, non-traumatic-urgent, and non-traumatic-non-urgent cases compared to 2019 (15.4% reduction, P = 0.038; 57.6% reduction, P = 0.002; 74.6% reduction, P = 0.005, respectively). There was a higher proportion of same-day presentations at commencement of symptoms in 2020 compared with 2019 (52.8% vs. 38.8%, respectively P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of OED visits at a tertiary hospital dropped by more than half. Although the drop in visits was mostly due to decrease in non-traumatic-non-urgent cases, there was also decrease in non-traumatic-urgent presentations with possible important visual consequences. Additional studies should elucidate what happened to these patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Oftalmopatías , Lesiones Oculares , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Oftalmopatías/clasificación , Oftalmopatías/epidemiología , Oftalmopatías/terapia , Lesiones Oculares/clasificación , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Lesiones Oculares/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendencias , Agudeza Visual
8.
Am J Emerg Med ; 51: 280-284, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34785483

RESUMEN

There are limited data regarding the utility of troponin testing in patients presenting with non-cardiovascular (CV) symptoms as the primary manifestation. The study population comprised 2057 patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) of a US healthcare system with non-CV symptoms as the primary manifestation between January and September 2018. We compared the effect of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) (n = 901) after its introduction vs. 4th generation cTnT (n = 1156) on the following outcomes measures: ED length of stay (LOS), coronary tests/procedures (angiography or stress test), and long-term mortality. Mean age was 64 ± 17 yrs., and 47% were female. Primary non-CV manifestations included pneumonia, obstructive pulmonary disease, infection, abdominal-complaint, and renal failure. Mean follow up was 9 ± 4 months. Patients' demographics and medical history were clinically similar between the two troponin groups. A second cTn test was obtained more frequently in the hs-cTnT than cTnT (84% vs. 32%; p < 0.001), possibly leading to a longer ED stay (8.1 ± 8.2 h vs 5.6 ± 3.4 h, respectively; p < 0.001). Coronary tests/procedures were performed at a significantly higher rate in the hs-cTnT than cTnT following the introduction of the hs-cTnT test (28% vs. 22%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that following the introduction of hs-cTnT testing, there was a significant 27% lower risk of long-term mortality from ED admission through follow-up (HR = 0.73, 95%CI 0.54-0.98; p = 0.035). In conclusion, we show that in patients presenting primarily with non-CV disorders, the implementation of the hs-cTnT was associated with a higher rate of diagnostic coronary procedures/interventions, possibly leading to improved long-term survival rates.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Troponina T/sangre , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Análisis Multivariante , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Análisis de Supervivencia
9.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 40(1): 33-37, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34782089

RESUMEN

After treating the acute anaphylactic reaction, the clinician's next task is to prevent a recurrence. The patient should be observed in the ED. How long this observation period should last depends on their clinical course, risk factors, and social support. All patients should be discharged with a prescription for 2 epinephrine autoinjectors and counseled on appropriate use. The patient should also receive education on the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis and avoiding triggers. The patient should follow-up with an allergy specialist who can confirm triggers and provide immunotherapy as indicated.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/terapia , Alta del Paciente , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21472, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34728661

RESUMEN

Acute healthcare services are extremely important, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, as healthcare demand has rapidly intensified, and resources have become insufficient. Studies on specific prepandemic hospitalization and emergency department visit (EDV) trends in proximity to death are limited. We examined time-trend specificities based on sex, age, and cause of death in the last 2 years of life. Datasets containing all hospitalizations and EDVs of elderly residents in Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy (N = 411,812), who died between 2002 and 2014 at ≥ 65 years, have been collected. We performed subgroup change-point analysis of monthly trends in the 2 years preceding death according to sex, age at death (65-74, 75-84, 85-94, and ≥ 95 years), and main cause of death (cancer, cardiovascular, or respiratory disease). The proportion of decedents (N = 142,834) accessing acute healthcare services increased exponentially in proximity to death (hospitalizations = 4.7, EDVs = 3.9 months before death). This was inversely related to age, with changes among the youngest and eldest decedents at 6.6 and 3.5 months for hospitalizations and at 4.6 and 3.3 months for EDVs, respectively. Healthcare use among cancer patients intensified earlier in life (hospitalizations = 6.8, EDVs = 5.8 months before death). Decedents from respiratory diseases were most likely to access hospital-based services during the last month of life. No sex-based differences were found. The greater use of acute healthcare services among younger decedents and cancer patients suggests that policies potentiating primary care support targeting these at-risk groups may reduce pressure on hospital-based services.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Hospitalización/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/patología , Causas de Muerte , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Cuidado Terminal
11.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0260101, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34843537

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review the reasons why postpartum women present to the emergency department (ED) over a short term (≤10 days post-delivery) and to identify the risk factors associated with early visits to the ED. METHODS: This retrospective chart review included all women who delivered at a regional health system (William Osler Health System, WOHS) in 2018 and presented to the WOHS ED within 10 days after delivery. Baseline descriptive statistics were used to examine the patient demographics and identify the timing of the postpartum visit. Univariate tests were used to identify significant predictors for admission. A multivariate model was developed based on backward selection from these significant factors to identify admission predictors. RESULTS: There were 381 visits identified, and the average age of the patients was 31.22 years (SD: 4.83), with median gravidity of 2 (IQR: 1-3). Most patients delivered via spontaneous vaginal delivery (53.0%). The median time of presentation to the ED was 5.0 days, with the following most common reasons: abdominal pain (21.5%), wound-related issues (12.6%), and urinary issues (9.7%). Delivery during the weekend (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.00-3.65, P = 0.05) was predictive of admission while Group B Streptococcus positive patients were less likely to be admitted (OR 0.22, CI 0.05-0.97, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study in a busy community setting that examined ED visits over a short postpartum period. Patient education on pain management and wound care can reduce the rate of early postpartum ED visits.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/tendencias , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/etiología , Adulto , Canadá , Causalidad , Parto Obstétrico/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Femenino , Número de Embarazos , Hospitalización , Humanos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Manejo del Dolor , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Cicatrización de Heridas
12.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21002, 2021 10 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34697335

RESUMEN

COVID19 infection was associated with possible psychiatric manifestations, including psychosis and mania. In addition, psychiatric disorders might be triggered by severe psychological reactions to the pandemic or the measures taken to contain it. This study aimed to assess the trends of new-onset psychosis/mania during the pandemic timeline. Psychiatric emergency department records during January-July 2019 and 2020 of two regional mental health centers were manually examined. Cases of new-onset psychosis or mania were found in 326 out of 5161 records examined. The ratio of these cases increased by 45.5% in 2020 compared to 2019 (189 out of 2367, 137 out of 2479, respectively, p = 0.001). The peak increase was in April 2020 (9.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.015). There was no association between the rise of new-onset psychotic or manic episodes and national incidence of COVID19 cases, as observed during Israel 2nd wave. PCR tests were negative, except a single case. In this study, an increase in new-onset psychosis/mania was identified during the initial phase of the pandemic. Though causality could not be directly inferred, lack of infection symptoms, negative PCR testing and temporal distribution incongruent with COVID19 caseload did not support a direct effect of SARS-CoV-2. Alternative explanations are discussed, such as psychological reaction to stress and preventive measures, as well as case-shifting between different mental health settings.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Femenino , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/tendencias , Humanos , Israel/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Estrés Psicológico , Adulto Joven
14.
Circ Heart Fail ; 14(10): e008573, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34587763

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An unprecedented shift to remote heart failure outpatient care occurred during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given challenges inherent to remote care, we studied whether remote visits (video or telephone) were associated with different patient usage, clinician practice patterns, and outcomes. METHODS: We included all ambulatory cardiology visits for heart failure at a multisite health system from April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019 (pre-COVID) or April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020 (COVID era), resulting in 10 591 pre-COVID in-person, 7775 COVID-era in-person, 1009 COVID-era video, and 2322 COVID-era telephone visits. We used multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions with propensity weighting and patient clustering to study ordering practices and outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with in-person visits, video visits were used more often by younger (mean 64.7 years [SD 14.5] versus 74.2 [14.1]), male (68.3% versus 61.4%), and privately insured (45.9% versus 28.9%) individuals (P<0.05 for all). Remote visits were more frequently used by non-White patients (35.8% video, 37.0% telephone versus 33.2% in-person). During remote visits, clinicians were less likely to order diagnostic testing (odds ratio, 0.20 [0.18-0.22] video versus in-person, 0.18 [0.17-0.19] telephone versus in-person) or prescribe ß-blockers (0.82 [0.68-0.99], 0.35 [0.26-0.47]), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (0.69 [0.50-0.96], 0.48 [0.35-0.66]), or loop diuretics (0.67 [0.53-0.85], 0.45 [0.37-0.55]). During telephone visits, clinicians were less likely to prescribe ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor/ARB (angiotensin receptor blockers)/ARNIs (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors; 0.54 [0.40-0.72]). Telephone visits but not video visits were associated with higher rates of 90-day mortality (1.82 [1.14-2.90]) and nonsignificant trends towards higher rates of 90-day heart failure emergency department visits (1.34 [0.97-1.86]) and hospitalizations (1.36 [0.98-1.89]). CONCLUSIONS: Remote visits for heart failure care were associated with reduced diagnostic testing and guideline-directed medical therapy prescription. Telephone but not video visits were associated with increased 90-day mortality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiólogos/tendencias , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/tendencias , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Teléfono/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias
15.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 42(5): 400-402, 2021 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34474709

RESUMEN

Background: On January 20, 2020, the first documented case of novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) was reported in the United States. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention continues to report more morbidity and mortality in adults than in children. Early in Pandemic, there was a concern that patients with asthma would be affected disproportionately from COVID-19, but this was not manifested. It is now recognized that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors that are used by the coronavirus for infection have low expression in children with atopy that may contribute to decreased infectivity in children who are atopic. There are several early reports of decreased emergency department (ED) visits for children with asthma. The authors previously reported a decrease in pediatric ED visits in the spring of 2020, which correlated with school closure. Objective: To determine if this trend of decreased ED visits for pediatric asthma was sustained throughout the first COVID-19 pandemic year. Methods: ED data from one inner city children's hospital were collected by using standard medical claims codes. Conclusion: We reported a sustained year of decreased ED visits for children with asthma in one pediatric ED in an inner-city hospital; this seemed to be secondary to school closure and decreased exposure to upper respiratory infections.


Asunto(s)
Asma , COVID-19/prevención & control , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/tendencias , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Asma/etiología , Asma/fisiopatología , Asma/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/prevención & control , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan , Distanciamiento Físico , Instituciones Académicas , Salud Urbana
16.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol ; 9(10): 671-680, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34481558

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) has been reported to be increasing in frequency during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to examine the rates of DKA hospital admissions and the patient demographics associated with DKA during the pandemic compared with in prepandemic years. METHODS: Using a comprehensive, multiethnic, national dataset, the Secondary Uses Service repository, we extracted all emergency hospital admissions in England coded with DKA from March 1 to June 30, 2020 (first wave of the pandemic), July 1 to Oct 31, 2020 (post-first wave), and Nov 1, 2020, to Feb 28, 2021 (second wave), and compared these with DKA admissions in the equivalent periods in 2017-20. We also examined baseline characteristics, mortality, and trends in patients who were admitted with DKA. FINDINGS: There were 8553 admissions coded with DKA during the first wave, 8729 during the post-first wave, and 10 235 during the second wave. Compared with preceding years, DKA admissions were 6% (95% CI 4-9; p<0·0001) higher in the first wave of the pandemic (from n=8048), 6% (3-8; p<0·0001) higher in the post-first wave (from n=8260), and 7% (4-9; p<0·0001) higher in the second wave (from n=9610). In the first wave, DKA admissions reduced by 19% (95% CI 16-21) in those with pre-existing type 1 diabetes (from n=4965 to n=4041), increased by 41% (35-47) in those with pre-existing type 2 diabetes (from n=2010 to n=2831), and increased by 57% (48-66) in those with newly diagnosed diabetes (from n=1072 to n=1681). Compared with prepandemic, type 2 diabetes DKA admissions were similarly common in older individuals and men but were higher in those of non-White ethnicities during the first wave. The increase in newly diagnosed DKA admissions occurred across all age groups and these were significantly increased in men and people of non-White ethnicities. In the post-first wave, DKA admissions did not return to the baseline level of previous years; DKA admissions were 14% (11-17) lower in patients with type 1 diabetes (from n=5208 prepandemic to n=4491), 30% (24-36) higher in patients with type 2 diabetes (from n=2011 to n=2613), and 56% (47-66) higher in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes (from n=1041 to n=1625). During the second wave, DKA admissions were 25% (22-27) lower in patients with type 1 diabetes (from n=5769 prepandemic to n=4337), 50% (44-56) higher in patients with type 2 diabetes (from n=2608 to n=3912), and 61% (52-70) higher in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes (from n=1234 to n=1986). INTERPRETATION: Our results provide evidence for differences in the numbers and characteristics of people presenting with DKA during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with in the preceding 3 years. Greater awareness of risk factors for DKA in type 2 diabetes and vigilance for newly diagnosed diabetes presenting with DKA during the COVID-19 pandemic might help mitigate the increased impact of DKA. FUNDING: None.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Cetoacidosis Diabética/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Vigilancia de la Población , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Cetoacidosis Diabética/terapia , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
17.
West J Emerg Med ; 22(5): 1032-1036, 2021 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34546877

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The cumulative burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the United States' healthcare system is substantial. To help mitigate this burden, novel solutions including telehealth and dedicated screening facilities have been used. However, there is limited data on the efficacy of such models and none assessing patient comfort levels with these changes in healthcare delivery. The aim of our study was to evaluate patients' perceptions of a drive-through medical treatment system in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Patients presenting to a drive-through COVID-19 medical treatment facility were surveyed about their experience following their visit. An anonymous questionnaire consisting of five questions, using a five-point Likert scale was distributed via electronic tablet. RESULTS: We obtained 827 responses over two months. Three quarters of respondents believed care received was similar to that in a traditional emergency department (ED). Overall positive impression of the drive-through was 86.6%, and 95% believed that it was more convenient. CONCLUSION: Overall, the drive-through medical system was perceived as more convenient than the ED and was viewed as a positive experience. While representing a dramatic change in the delivery model of medical care, if such systems can provide comparable levels of care, they may be a viable option for sustained and surge healthcare delivery.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Pandemias , Acceso de los Pacientes a los Registros/psicología , Triaje/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19 , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Percepción , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Triaje/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
West J Emerg Med ; 22(5): 1060-1066, 2021 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34546881

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Very little is known about the effects of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and its associated social distancing practices on trauma presentations to the emergency department (ED). This study aims to assess the impact of a city-wide stay at home order on the volume, type, and outcomes of traumatic injuries at urban EDs. METHODS: The study was a retrospective chart review of all patients who presented to the ED of an urban Level I Trauma Center and its urban community affiliate in the time period during the 30 days before the institution of city-wide shelter-in-place (preSIP) order and 60 days after the shelter-in-place (SIP) order and the date-matched time periods in the preceding year. Volume and mechanism of traumatic injuries were compared using paired T-tests. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in overall ED volume. The volume of certain blunt trauma presentations (motor vehicle collisions) during the first 60 days of SIP compared to the same period from the year prior also significantly decreased. Importantly, the volume of penetrating injuries, including gunshot wounds and stab wounds, did not differ for the preSIP and SIP periods when compared to the prior year. The mortality of traumatic injuries was also unchanged during the SIP comparison period. CONCLUSION: While there were significant decreases in visits to the ED and overall trauma volume, penetrating trauma, including gun violence, and other severe traumatic injuries remain a public health crisis that affects urban communities despite social distancing recommendations enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Cuarentena , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Población Urbana
19.
Arch Dis Child ; 106(11): 1050-1055, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34462264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Globally, injuries cause >5 million deaths annually and children and young people are particularly vulnerable. Injuries are the leading cause of death in people aged 5-24 years and a leading cause of disability. In most low-income and middle-income countries where the majority of global child injury burden occurs, systems for routinely collecting injury data are limited. METHODS: A new model of injury surveillance for use in emergency departments in Nepal was designed and piloted. Data from patients presenting with injuries were collected prospectively over 12 months and used to describe the epidemiology of paediatric injury presentations. RESULTS: The total number of children <18 years of age presenting with injury was 2696, representing 27% of all patients presenting with injuries enrolled. Most injuries in children presenting to the emergency departments in this study were unintentional and over half of children were <10 years of age. Falls, animal bites/stings and road traffic injuries accounted for nearly 75% of all injuries with poisonings, burns and drownings presenting proportionately less often. Over half of injuries were cuts, bites and open wounds. In-hospital child mortality from injury was 1%. CONCLUSION: Injuries affecting children in Nepal represent a significant burden. The data on injuries observed from falls, road traffic injuries and injuries related to animals suggest potential areas for injury prevention. This is the biggest prospective injury surveillance study in Nepal in recent years and supports the case for using injury surveillance to monitor child morbidity and mortality through improved data.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga Global de Enfermedades/economía , Vigilancia en Salud Pública/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Animales , Mordeduras y Picaduras/epidemiología , Quemaduras/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Ahogamiento/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Nepal/epidemiología , Intoxicación/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Heridas y Lesiones/prevención & control
20.
Respirology ; 26(11): 1041-1048, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34365699

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused disruption to health, social interaction, travel and economies worldwide. In New Zealand, the government closed the border to non-residents and required all arrivals to quarantine for 14 days. They also implemented a strict contact-restriction system to eliminate COVID-19 from the community. These measures also reduced the circulation of other respiratory viruses such as influenza and respiratory syncytial virus. We assessed the impact of these measures on hospital admissions for respiratory and cardiac diseases. METHODS: National data on hospital admissions for each week of 2020 were compared to admissions for the previous 5 years. Analyses were curtailed after week 33, when a COVID-19 outbreak in Auckland led to different levels of pandemic restrictions making national data difficult to interpret. RESULTS: The numbers of acute infectious respiratory admissions were similar to previous years before the introduction of COVID-19 restrictions, but then fell lower and remained low after the pandemic restrictions were eased. The usual winter peak in respiratory admissions was not seen in 2020. Other than small reductions during the period of the strictest contact restrictions, non-infectious respiratory and cardiac admissions were similar to previous years and the usual winter peak in heart failure admissions was observed. CONCLUSION: The observed patterns of hospital admissions in 2020 are compatible with the hypothesis that circulating respiratory viruses drive the normal seasonal trends in respiratory admissions. By contrast, these findings suggest that respiratory viruses do not drive the winter peak in heart failure.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Pandemias , Cuarentena/psicología , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Niño , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...